This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by FINSEN, V. Articles by BENUM, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by FINSEN, V. Articles by BENUM, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Regional Bone Mineral Density Changes after Colles’ and Forehand Fractures

From Trondheim University, Trondheim, Norway

Patients who sustain a second Colles’ fracture only in one of five instances refracture the previously injured wrist. In those who have sustained fractures of the metacarpals or phalanges of the hand (forehand) subsequent fractures of the forehand are twice as likely to be ipsilateral. We investigated whether persisting regional bone mineral changes could be the mechanism underlying these observations.

Bilateral bone mineral density measurements were performed on twenty patients who had sustained a Colles’ fracture and twenty-nine who had sustained forehand fractures more than one year previously.

Among Colles’ fracture patients there was an increase in bone mineral density in the distal radius of the fractured side when compared to the uninjured side of thirty-nine percent. The protection of these patients from subsequent ipsilateral Colles’ fracture seems to be due to increased bone strength induced by the healing process.

Among patients with forehand fractures no significant bone mineral changes could be demonstrated.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 11, No. 3, 357-359 (1986)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(86)90157-9


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?