Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SANDERSON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by FAHMY, N. R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SANDERSON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by FAHMY, N. R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Long-Term Review of the Harrison-Nicolle Peg in Digital Arthrodesis

P. L. SANDERSON
M. A. MORRIS
N. R. M. FAHMY

From the Hand Unit, Stockport Infirmary, Cheshire

Correspondence: Mr M. A. Morris, The Hand Unit, Stockport Infirmary, Wellington Road South, Stockport, Cheshire, SK1 3UJ

Fifty arthrodeses of the digital joints using the Harrison-Nicolle peg in 22 patients have been reviewed at a mean of 8.5 years after operation. 96% of these operations were judged to have been successful by our patients, most of whom were suffering from inflammatory joint disease. 66% went on to bony union, 30% to fibrous union and 4% to non-union. There was no difference in clinical outcome between the bony and fibrous union groups and only those with non-union were disappointed. All arthrodeses remained in the same angle of flexion as that in which they were originally fixed.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 16, No. 3, 283-285 (1991)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(91)90055-S


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?