Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SØNDERGAARD, L.
Right arrow Articles by RECHNAGEL, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SØNDERGAARD, L.
Right arrow Articles by RECHNAGEL, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Cemented Caffinière Prosthesis for Trapezio-Metacarpal Arthroplasty

L. SØNDERGAARD
L. KONRADSEN
K. RECHNAGEL

From the Department of Orthopaedics, Hillerød County Hospital, Denmark

Correspondence: Lars Søndergaard, Skansevej 67, 1.th., 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

20 patients with 22 Caffinière prostheses in the trapezio-metacarpal joint were evaluated at a median of nine years after operation. The indication was degenerative osteoarthrosis in 20 cases and rheumatoid arthritis in two cases. We found 18 of the 22 (82%) original prostheses still in place, with satisfactory pain relief and good function. Three hands had been revised due to aseptic loosening, with replacement of two cups and one total prosthesis. Two of the revised prostheses were functioning well 61/2 and 10 years after the revision. We conclude that function does not deteriorate within the first nine years, that late loosening is not a significant problem with this prosthesis and that, if aseptic loosening occurs, it is possible to obtain good results by replacing the loose component.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 16, No. 4, 428-430 (1991)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(91)90019-K
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?