Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de JAGER, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by HEYWOOD, A. W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de JAGER, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by HEYWOOD, A. W. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The A1 Pulley in Rheumatoid Flexor Tenosynovectomy

To retain or divide?

L. T. de JAGER
R. JAFFE
I. D. LEARMONTH
A. W. B. HEYWOOD

From Princess Alice Orthopaedic Hospital and the University of Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence: Dr L.T. de Jager, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Observatory 1925, South Africa.

We report a detailed comparative evaluation of flexor tenosynovectomy in 55 fingers in which the A1 pulley was divided and 45 fingers in which the A1 pulley was retained. The metacarpophalangeal joint subluxed volarly in 49% when the A1 pulley was divided, compared to 11% when the pulley was preserved. Bowstringing occurred in 7% and only when the A1 pulley was divided. Ulnar deviation was 7° worse when the pulley was divided. Active range of movement was limited in both groups. It was 11° less when the A1 pulley was divided.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 19, No. 2, 202-204 (1994)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90166-X


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?