Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANZETTA, M.
Right arrow Articles by CONOLLY, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LANZETTA, M.
Right arrow Articles by CONOLLY, W. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Silicone Synovitis

A perspective

M. LANZETTA
T. J. HERBERT
W. B. CONOLLY

From the Sydney Hospital Hand Unit, Australia

Correspondence: Dr Timothy J. Herbert FRCS, FRACS, St Luke’s Hospital, Hand Unit, 18 Roslyn Street, 2011 Potts Point, NSW Australia.

Silicone implant arthroplasty is, arguably, the most effective treatment for the majority of patients with symptomatic arthritis in the hand and wrist. In 1985 the problem of silicone synovitis was first brought to our attention. Since that time there have been numerous reports on this condition leading to a worldwide trend against the use of silicone implants. However, the true incidence and effects of silicone synovitis have not been clearly defined. For this reason, we have undertaken a survey of all patients who have undergone silicone implant arthroplasty in the wrist and hand in our Unit between 1975 and 1990.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and those undergoing MP or IP joint arthroplasty were excluded. Of the 289 implant arthroplasties remaining, we have been able to review personally 229 implants with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1–15). Although 40% of cases showed significant radiological changes, only 11 patients (4.8%) developed symptoms requiring treatment. Of these, two were managed conservatively whilst the rest underwent revision surgery, all with entirely satisfactory results.

We conclude that silicone implant arthroplasty remains the treatment of choice for patients with painful joint disease in the hand and wrist.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 19, No. 4, 479-484 (1994)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90213-5
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?