Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHAMAY, A.
Right arrow Articles by PIAGET-MOREROD, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHAMAY, A.
Right arrow Articles by PIAGET-MOREROD, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Arthrodesis of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint

A. CHAMAY
F. PIAGET-MOREROD

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence: Dr André Chamay, 15, Rue Général Dujour, 1204 Genève, Switzerland.

Over a 10-year period, 32 trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint fusions were performed in 29 patients, and reviewed. Pin fixation with tension band wiring was used in 14 cases, screws in eight cases, a plate in six cases, K-wires in three cases and staple fixation in one case. None was bone grafted. Splinting was applied for 4 to 5 weeks. There were four cases of delayed union (more than 2 months) and four cases of non-union requiring re-operation (12.5%). The average follow-up was 6 years and 7 months. Grip (26.5 kg) and pinch (4.9 kg) strength were respectively 7% and 18% less than the normal contralateral side. In bilateral osteoarthritis, grip and pinch were stronger than the contralateral side.

Joint angulations measured on X-ray films showed for the peritrapezial joint an 18° arc in flexion-extension (a reduction of 64% compared to the contralateral side) and 11° of arc in abduction-adduction (a reduction of 72%). MP joint mobility increased in extension (160%), in flexion (23%), in abduction (120%), in adduction (157%). Despite the marked decrease in motion, subjective functional complaints were minimal. 78.1% of the patients were fully satisfied, 15.6% partly satisfied, and 6.3% dissatisfied. Pain was absent in 50% of the cases and very mild in 40.7%. Three patients complained of discomfort. Eight patients were noted to have osteoarthritic changes in the scaphotrapezial joint.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 19, No. 4, 489-497 (1994)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90215-1


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?