Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMAHON, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by BURGE, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMAHON, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by BURGE, P. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Initial Treatment of Closed Metacarpal Fractures

A controlled comparison of compression glove and splintage

P. J. McMAHON
D. A. WOODS
P. D. BURGE

From the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Correspondence: Mr P. D. Burge, Consultant Hand Surgeon, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

A prospective clinical trial compared two forms of initial management for closed stable fractures of the shaft of the finger metacarpals. Patients were randomized to treatment with a compression glove and early mobilization (21 patients) or to immobilization in a plaster splint (21 patients).

The mean loss of total active flexion (MP+PIP+DIP) in the second week after injury was 56° in the glove group and 84° in the splint group (P=0.0036). In the third week, the mean loss of flexion was 23° and 46° respectively (P=0.0010).

Hand volume and PIP joint circumference were significantly smaller in the glove group in the second week but not in the third and fourth weeks. Within each group, however, there was no correlation between range of motion and swelling, suggesting that these were independent variables in this study.

The support of the glove helped to relieve pain. Use of a compression glove avoided the loss of function imposed by splintage and was associated with a greater range of movement during the second and third weeks.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 19, No. 5, 597-600 (1994)
DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90123-6


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?