Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SILFVERSKIÖLD, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by MAY, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SILFVERSKIÖLD, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by MAY, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Early Active Mobilization after Tendon Transfers Using Mesh Reinforced Suture Techniques

K. L. SILFVERSKIÖLD
E. J. MAY

From the Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sahlgren Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence: K. L. Silfverskiöld, 12 Wolseley Road, Blackwood, South Australia 5051, Australia.

23 tendon transfers in the hand and forearm were performed using a polyester mesh sleeve to reinforce conventional suture techniques. All transfers were mobilized with active flexion and extension within 3 days of operation. Excluding one rupture (due to extreme unintentional loading) and depending on the type of transfer used, a mean of between 69% and 78% of the final active range of motion was obtained 1 month post-operatively. With the exception of transfers for wrist extension, the mean final active range of motion amounted to between 91% and 100% of the available passive range of motion and between 75% and 100% of the corresponding "normal" active range of motion in the opposite hand. The mean final active range of motion after reconstructions for wrist extension amounted to 85% of the passive range of motion and to at least 80% of the maximum range of motion potentially available with the transfers used. The results indicate that early active mobilization after tendon transfers may offer significant advantages in terms of quicker and simpler rehabilitation as well as improved results.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 20, No. 3, 291-300 (1995)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80081-6
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?