Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHAKRABARTI, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by GALLAGHER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHAKRABARTI, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by GALLAGHER, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

De La Caffinière Thumb Carpometacarpal Replacements

93 cases at 6 to 16 years follow-up

A. J. CHAKRABARTI
A. H. N. ROBINSON
P. GALLAGHER

From the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich, UK

Correspondence: Mr A. J. Chakrabarti, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP, UK.

The results of 93 de la Caffinière thumb joint replacements in 71 patients were reviewed between 6 and 16 years. The survival rate was 89% at 16 years. Eleven thumb joints had failed requiring revision. The commonest reason for failure was aseptic loosening of the trapezial component. The failure rate was higher in men of working age than any other group, which possibly reflects the increased demands on the prosthesis of these patients. We support the use of this implant for degenerative osteoarthritis, but caution against its use in men under 65 years.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 22, No. 6, 695-698 (1997)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80427-5


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?