Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTONE, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by SCOTT, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTONE, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by SCOTT, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy in the Investigation of Chronic Wrist Pain

D. J. JOHNSTONE
S. THOROGOOD
W. H. SMITH
T. D. SCOTT

From the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Radiology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals, Truro, UK

Correspondence: Mr D. J. Johnstone, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Hospital, Wonford Road, Exeter, Devon EX2 4UE, UK.

Forty-three patients with chronic wrist pain have been investigated prospectively with magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Pathology within the wrist joint was detected in 30 cases with magnetic resonance imaging and 32 cases with arthroscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging compared with arthroscopy were 0.8 and 0.7 for triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology, 0.37 and 1.0 for scapholunate ligament and 0 and 0.97 for lunotriquetral ligament. It is concluded that magnetic resonance imaging is unhelpful in the investigation of suspected carpal instability. In analysis of the triangular fibrocartilage complex, the results of magnetic resonance imaging should be interpreted with caution.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 22, No. 6, 714-718 (1997)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80431-7
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?