Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LENIHAN, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by GLASBY, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LENIHAN, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by GLASBY, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Stimulated Jitter Measurement in the Assessment of Recovery after different Methods of Peripheral Nerve Repair

D. V. LENIHAN
N. M. SOJITRA
M. A. GLASBY

From the Department of Anatomy, University of Edinburgh Medical School Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence: Mr M. A. Glasby, Department of Anatomy, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK

The recording of stimulated jitter offers a quantitative method for following the recovery of neuromuscular function after peripheral nerve repair. In groups of rats, electrophysiological recording of jitter was carried out on control animals and on animals 90 days after sciatic nerve division and subsequent repair with either direct end-to-end suture (NS), nerve graft (NG) or freeze thawed muscle graft (FTMG). It was found that values for jitter were highest in the FTMG group. The NS and NG groups demonstrated statistically similar jitter values when compared with each other and with the normal. It was concluded that the speed of nerve regeneration is slower in the FTMG group, at least initially, and that 90 days after sciatic nerve repair the FMTG group had an increase in the number of immature neuromuscular junctions when compared with the NS or NG groups. Jitter measurement would appear to offer a means of detecting small differences in nerve regeneration. The value of this in future developments in nerve repair is discussed.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 23, No. 1, 12-16 (1998)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80209-X
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?