Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LENIHAN, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by GLASBY, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LENIHAN, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by GLASBY, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Biodegradable Controlled Release Glass in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injuries

D. V. LENIHAN
A. J. CARTER
T. GILCHRIST
D. M. HEALY
I. A MILLER
L. M. MYLES
M. A. GLASBY

From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh and Giltech Limited, Ayr, UK

Correspondence: Mr M. A. Glasby, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.

The experiments in this paper were concerned with the recovery of function and ease of application of an entubulation technique using a biodegradable, controlled release glass tube (CRG) for the repair of a transected peripheral nerve. The peroneal nerves of 15 New Zealand White rabbits were repaired with either a CRG tube filled with freeze-thawed muscle, or a conventional freeze thawed muscle graft (FTMG). These were compared with controls in which a CRG was used to enclose the cut ends of a nerve separated by a 1 cm gap. Electrophysiological and morphometric assessment was carried out 6 months after repair. No statistical difference was found in any test between the FTMG and the CRG tube filled with freeze thawed muscle. The CRG tube and 1 cm gap produced inferior levels of recovery of function when compared with the other two repair groups.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 23, No. 5, 588-593 (1998)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80007-7
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?