Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOX, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by SOTEREANOS, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOX, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by SOTEREANOS, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Compass Elbow Hinge: Indications and Initial Results

R. J. FOX
S. E. VARITIMIDIS
A. PLAKSEYCHUK
D. G. VARDAKAS
M. M. TOMAINO
D. G. SOTEREANOS

From the Division of Hand and Upper Extremity, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Correspondence: Dr. Dean G. Sotereanos, Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaufmann Building, Suite 1010, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. E-mail: dsoterea{at}uoi.upmc.edu

The Compass Elbow Hinge uses Illizarov’s methods of fixation to externally hold the elbow reduced and allow both passive and active motion. Eleven patients with degenerative disease, contracture or instability were treated with the Compass Elbow Hinge and were retrospectively evaluated at an average follow-up of 29 months (range: 18–62 months). One was lost to follow-up. Patients with degenerative changes underwent fascia lata interposition while those treated for contractures underwent anterior and posterior capsular release with or without fascia lata interposition. Those with elbow instability underwent ligament reconstruction. The device was removed after 6 weeks and seven of the 11 patients were satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Stability could not be achieved in two patients with coronoid fractures that were not reconstructed. One patient did not tolerate the device and requested its removal with subsequent subluxation. We conclude that patient selection and compliance are key elements in achieving a satisfactory outcome with the device.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 25, No. 6, 568-572 (2000)
DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0425


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?