Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SYNNOTT, K.
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SYNNOTT, K.
Right arrow Articles by KELLY, E. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Outcome Measures Following Metacarpophalangeal Joint Replacement

K. SYNNOTT
H. MULLETT
H. FAULL
E. P. KELLY

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin

Correspondence: Dr Keith Synnott, 19 Conquer Hill Avenue, Clontarf, Dublin 3, Ireland.

We used the Jebsen–Taylor hand function assessment system to prospectively study the effect of metacarpophalangeal joint replacement on overall hand function in 29 hands. In addition pain relief, subjective improvement in hand function, appearance and overall patient satisfaction were assessed.

There was modest improvement in the number of Jebsen–Taylor tasks performed (1.8 to 3.1), and pain relief was good or excellent in 18 of 24 patients. Eleven patients felt their hand function had improved by more than 50%, and the majority of patients (22 of 24) were very satisfied with the procedure.

This study demonstrates that despite limited improvements in objective outcome measures, this procedure is reliable in producing a very high rate of patient satisfaction.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 25, No. 6, 601-603 (2000)
DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?