Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SINHA, S.
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SINHA, S.
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Single Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing N-Butyl 2-Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (Indermil) and Sutures For Skin Closure in Hand Surgery

S. SINHA
M. NAIK
V. WRIGHT
J. TIMMONS
A. C. CAMPBELL

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK

Correspondence: Mr S. Sinha, Department of Orthopaedics, Monklands District General Hospital, Monkscourt Avenue, Airdrie ML6 0JS, UK. E-mail: write2satya{at}hotmail.com

Fifty patients underwent a variety of hand operations and were randomized for wound closure either with tissue adhesive (Indermil) or sutures. The two treatment groups had similar demographic characteristics and similar outcomes at the 2 and 6 week postoperative assessments which were performed by a designated tissue viability nurse blinded to the method of closure. Five minor wound dehiscences occurred: three in the adhesive group and two in the suture group. No infection occurred in either group. In conclusion, the study demonstrates tissue adhesive is as effective as suture in this type of hand surgery.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 26, No. 3, 264-265 (2001)
DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0572
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?