Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JONES, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JONES, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Role of Human-Derived Fibrin Sealant in the Reduction of Postoperative Flexor Tendon Adhesion Formation in Rabbits

M. E. JONES
S. BURNETT
A. SOUTHGATE
P. SIBBONS
A. O. GROBBELAAR
C. J. GREEN

From the RAFT Institute of Plastic Surgery, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, The Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, and ConvaTec WHRI, Deeside, Flintshire, Wales, UK

Correspondence: Mr Martin E. Jones, RAFT Institute, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK. E-mail: martine.jones{at}virgin.net

This study assessed the role of a novel fibrin sealant (Vivostat®) in adhesion reduction after flexor tendon surgery. The deep flexor tendons of the 2nd and 4th digits of the left paw of 20 rabbits were exposed and a standard partial injury was performed on each. The rabbits were randomized to either immediate post-injury treatment with Vivostat® or no treatment. In each case active movement of the 2nd digit was prevented while the 4th digit was allowed to move normally. The two groups were assessed at 14 days for adhesion formation with a tensiometer. The right paw acted as the unoperated control. Results showed that there was no significant difference in the force needed to remove the tendon from its sheath when comparing the two Vivostat®-treated groups to the unoperated controls. There was, however, a highly significant difference in this force between the non-Vivostat®-treated groups and the unoperated controls. This suggests a beneficial effect of Vivostat® in reducing post surgical tendon adhesion formation.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 27, No. 3, 278-282 (2002)
DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0752
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?