This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by JEROSCH-HEROLD, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by JEROSCH-HEROLD, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Study of the Relative Responsiveness of Five Sensibility Tests for Assessment of Recovery after Median Nerve Injury and Repair

From the School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Correspondence: Dr C. Jerosch-Herold, Senior Lecturer in Occupational Therapy, School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of East Anglia, Queens Building, GB-Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK. Tel.: +44-1603-593316; fax: +44-1603-593166; E-mail: c.jerosch-herold{at}uea.ac.uk.

A longitudinal dynamic cohort study was conducted on patients with median nerve injuries to evaluate the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests: touch threshold using the WEST (monofilaments), static two-point discrimination, locognosia, a pick-up test and an object recognition test. Repeated assessments were performed starting at 6 months after surgery. In order to compare the relative responsiveness of each test, effect size and the standard response mean were calculated for sensibility changes occurring between 6 and 18 months after repair.

Large effect sizes (>0.8) and standard response means (>0.8) were obtained for the WEST, locognosia, pick-up and object recognition tests. Two-point discrimination was hardly measurable at any time point and exhibited strong flooring effects. Further analysis of all time points was undertaken to assess the strength of the monotonic relationship between test scores and time elapsed since surgery. Comparison of monotonicity between the five tests indicated that the WEST performed best, whereas two-point discrimination performed worst. These results suggest that the monofilament test (WEST), locognosia test, Moberg pick-up test and tactile gnosis test capture sensibility changes over time well and should be considered for inclusion in the outcome assessment of patients with median nerve injury.

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 28, No. 3, 255-260 (2003)
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00017-2


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?