This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GREENSLADE, J. R. Articles by WARWICK, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by GREENSLADE, J. R. Articles by WARWICK, D. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Dash and Boston Questionnaire Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Outcome: What is the Responsiveness of an Outcome Questionnaire?

From the Upper Limb Team, Department of Orthopaedics and Research and Development Support Unit, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK

Correspondence: Mr David Warwick, MD, FRCS, FRCS(orth), Consultant Hand Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, F-level, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. Tel.: +44-2380-796248; E-mail: davidwarwick{at}handsurgery.co.uk

This prospective study evaluates if the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is an adequately responsive outcome measure in carpal tunnel syndrome by comparing it with the disease-specific Boston questionnaire (BQ). To measure responsiveness (sensitivity to clinical change), 57 patients with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome completed the DASH and BQ preoperatively and again 3 months after open carpal tunnel decompression. A second group of 31 patients completed the questionnaires in the outpatient clinic and again 2 weeks later to assess test–retest reliability. The time to complete all questionnaires was recorded. Responsiveness of the DASH is comparable with the BQ with standardized response means of 0.66, 1.07 and 0.62 for the DASH, BQ-symptoms and BQ-function, respectively. Test–retest data show both questionnaires are reliable. Mean times to complete questionnaires were 6.8 minutes (DASH) and 5.6 minutes (BQ). This study concludes that the DASH questionnaire is a reliable, responsive and practical outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Key Words: carpal tunnel release • DASH questionnaire • outcome measures

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 29, No. 2, 159-164 (2004)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. S. ROSALES, I. D. DE LA LASTRA, S. MCCABE, J. I. ORTEGA MARTINEZ, and Y. M. HIDALGO The Relative Responsiveness and Construct Validity of the Spanish Version of the Dash Instrument for Outcomes Assessment in Open Carpal Tunnel Release J Hand Surg Eur Vol., February 1, 2009; 34(1): 72 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]