Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KHARWADKAR, N.
Right arrow Articles by MOLITOR, P. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KHARWADKAR, N.
Right arrow Articles by MOLITOR, P. J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Carpal Tunnel Release

N. KHARWADKAR
S. NAIQUE
P. J. A. MOLITOR

From the Orthopaedics and Trauma Department, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Cliff Gardens, Scunthorpe, DN15 7BH, North Lincolnshire, UK

Correspondence: Mr N. Kharwadkar, 16 Sandlewood Cresent, Meanwood, Leeds LS6 4RT, UK. Tel.: +44 7958 030 366; fax: +44 1724 290 050; E-mail: nkharwadkar{at}hotmail.com

A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare the influence of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures on pillar pain, scar tenderness, extent of wound inflammation and overall outcome of the surgery following open carpal tunnel release. Forty hands in 33 patients (mean age, 51 years; range, 31–74 years) were randomized into group A (absorbable sutures) or group B (non-absorbable sutures). Clinical assessment was done at 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up. The outcome of surgery in terms of improvement of severity of symptoms and functional status of patients was assessed using a self-administered Boston Questionnaire. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of our outcome measures at the final follow-up.

Key Words: open carpal tunnel release • pillar pain • scar tenderness • suture material

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 30, No. 1, 92-95 (2005)
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.10.009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
K. HOWARD, A. J. M. SIMISON, A. MORRIS, and V. BHALAIK
A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., October 1, 2009; 34(5): 618 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]