Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BULSTRODE, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by GROBBELAAR, A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BULSTRODE, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by GROBBELAAR, A. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Extensor Tendon Rehabilitation a Prospective Trial Comparing Three Rehabilitation Regimes

N. W. BULSTRODE
N. BURR
A. L. PRATT
A. O. GROBBELAAR

From the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Therapy Unit, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK

Correspondence: Mr A.O. Grobbelaar, Department of Plastic Surgery, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK. Tel.: +44 1923 844412; fax: +44 20 7486 7288. E-mail: aog{at}talk21.com

Forty-two patients with 46 complete extensor tendon injuries were prospectively allocated to one of three rehabilitation regimes: static splintage; interphalangeal joint mobilization with metacarpophalangeal joint immobilization or; the "Norwich" regime. All 42 patients were operated on by one surgeon and assessed by one hand therapist.

At 4 weeks the total active motion in the static splintage group was significantly reduced but by 12 weeks there was no difference between the regimes. There was no difference in total active motion between the repaired and uninjured hand at 12 weeks, with all patients achieving good or excellent results. However, grip strength at 12 weeks was significantly reduced compared to the uninjured hand after static splintage. There was no difference in hand therapy input between the regimes.

Key Words: extensor tendon repair • Norwich regime • static splintage

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 30, No. 2, 175-179 (2005)
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.10.016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?