Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATIL, S.
Right arrow Articles by STOTHARD, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PATIL, S.
Right arrow Articles by STOTHARD, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Local Anaesthesia for Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Comparison of Two Techniques

S. PATIL
M. RAMAKRISHNAN
J. STOTHARD

From the James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, UK

Correspondence: Mr. Sunit Patil, C/o Mr. Hui’s secretary, Ward 33, James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK. Tel.: +44 7906 185854; fax. +44 1642 282784. E-mail: sunitpatil{at}aol.com

Carpal tunnel decompression is mostly performed as a day case procedure using local anaesthesia. The local anaesthetic is commonly administered by subcutaneous infiltration alone (the Gale technique) or by infiltration of the local anaesthetic into the carpal tunnel in addition to the subcutaneous infiltration (the Altissimi and Mancini technique). The intention of this study was to compare the efficacy of anaesthesia using these two techniques. Twenty patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome were recruited. One side underwent surgery at a time. Patients were randomised to receive anaesthesia by one technique on the first side and the other on the second. Pain was evaluated using the numerical rating pain scale (0–10). Six patients experienced intraoperative pain with the Gale technique, while none had pain with the Altissimi and Mancini technique (P = 0.02). The postoperative pain was not significantly different between the two groups, although the patients anaesthetised by the Altissimi and Mancini technique required significantly lower numbers of analgesic tablets.

Key Words: carpal tunnel • local anaesthesia

Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), Vol. 31, No. 6, 683-686 (2006)
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2006.08.008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?