Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SABAPATHY, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by RAJASEKARAN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SABAPATHY, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by RAJASEKARAN, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Technical Considerations and Functional Outcome of 22 Major Replantations (The BSSH Douglas Lamb Lecture, 2005)

S. RAJA SABAPATHY
H. VENKATRAMANI
R. R. BHARATHI
J. DHEENADHAYALAN
V. R. BHAT
S. RAJASEKARAN

From the Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 043, India

Correspondence: Dr S. Raja Sabapathy, MS, MCh, DNB, FRCS, Head of Department, Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 043, India. Tel.: +91 422 2485000; fax: +91 422 2436444. E-mail:rajahand{at}vsnl.com

Twenty-two consecutive major replantations carried out over a 5-year period were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Only two patients suffered guillotine amputations. The remainders were either crush, or crush avulsion amputation. Replantation was successful in 20 cases. When analysed by Chen’s criteria, there were three Grade I, nine Grade II, six Grade III and two Grade IV results. Most patients with successful replants put the hand to greater use with time and replantation greatly added to the overall well-being of the patient. We consider major replantation as a worthwhile procedure. Radical debridement, bone shortening and well laid out protocols to reduce the ischaemia time are important for success. The technical details which we believe to be important for success are outlined. With decreasing numbers of such injuries in most countries, this paper may help surgeons faced with an occasional patient with a major amputation to make the right decisions.

Key Words: major replantation • techniques • functional outcome

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 32, No. 5, 488-501 (2007)
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSE.2007.06.013


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?