| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Comparison of Zones 1 to 4 Flexor Tendon Repairs Using Absorbable and Unabsorbable Four-strand Core SuturesFrom the Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, the Department of Occupational Therapy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, the Department of Physiotherapy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London and the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Imperial College, London Correspondence: Mr Robert H. Caulfield, Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK. Mobile: 7904 115 961. E-mail: rcaulfield{at}talk21.com. Absorbable sutures behave favourably in vitro and in an animal model. We report the outcome of flexor tendon injuries in a series of 272 consecutive patients treated over 45 months with a mean follow-up of 4 (range 3–12) months. Five hundred and seventy-six tendons were repaired in 416 digits. The patients were not randomised and all repairs were performed using a Strickland four-strand core technique. In 191 (73%) patients an absorbable core suture was used (Group 1) and in 81 (27%) a non-absorbable material was used (Group 2). There were six ruptures (2%) in Group 1 and two (2%) in Group 2. Using the original Strickland criteria, there were 72% excellent/good and 28% fair/poor results in the absorbable core suture group, and 73% and 27%, respectively, in the non-absorbable core suture group. This study suggests that appropriate absorbable core sutures can be used safely for flexor tendon repair.
Key Words: flexor tendon repair absorbable sutures non-absorbable sutures four-strand core repair
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 33, No. 4,
412-417 (2008) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

