Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1753193408102117v1
34/3/367    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NISAR, A.
Right arrow Articles by CHAKRABARTI, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NISAR, A.
Right arrow Articles by CHAKRABARTI, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Day Case Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Hand: Results in a District General Hospital

A. NISAR
Z. SHAH
A. PENDSE
I. CHAKRABARTI

From Rotherham General Hospital, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK

Correspondence: Aamer Nisar, 11 Garden Walk, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S60 3HY, UK. Tel.: +44 1709530090; fax: +44 1709530090. E-mail:aamnis{at}aol.co.uk.

The aim of this study was to review the short-term results of joint replacement in the hand, comparing those done as day cases with those done as inpatients. Procedures included trapeziometacarpal, metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasties. For day cases a portable laminar flow machine was used, whereas inpatient procedures were carried out in a laminar flow theatre. The postoperative regime was the same in the two groups. The mean follow-up was 12 months. There was no difference in complications, revisions, pain scores and Quick-DASH scores. No early loosening has been detected in any patients at a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up. All patients who had day surgery were satisfied with the care. The results of day case small joint arthroplasty of the hand are similar to those in inpatients.

Key Words: day surgery • trapeziometacarpal arthritis • hand joint arthroplasty • portable laminar airflow

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 34, No. 3, 367-370 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1753193408102117


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?