Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HIRPARA, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by O’SULLIVAN, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HIRPARA, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by O’SULLIVAN, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The optimum length of the Silfverskiöld circumferential cross stitch

K. M. HIRPARA
P. J. SULLIVAN
B. O’NEILL
M. O’SULLIVAN

From the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery and The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway Regional Hospitals, Galway, Ireland

Correspondence: K. M. Hirpara, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. E-mail:kie_hirpara{at}hotmail.com.

Three groups of six porcine deep flexor tendons were repaired with a locking loop modified Kessler core suture using 4-0 braided polyester. Silfverskiöld repairs were performed using 6-0 monofilament nylon taking bites 2, 4 and 6 mm from the cut end of the tendon. The repairs were tested to failure and record made of bulking, mode of failure, force to produce a 3 mm gap and the ultimate strength. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, with analysis of mode of failure using the Chi-squared test. The 4 mm repairs were significantly stronger than the 2 mm for all parameters but there was no difference between the 4 mm and 6 mm repairs. We feel that optimal repair strength is provided using bites 4 mm from the cut tendon ends. Taking bites further from the cut end has no significant benefits and carries the theoretical risk of increasing the work of flexion.

Key Words: circumferential repair • Silfverskiöld • flexor tendon • tensile testing • length of repair

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 34, No. 5, 651-655 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1753193409090102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?