| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Long Oblique/Spiral Mid-Shaft Metacarpal Fractures of the Fingers: Treatment with Cerclage Wire Fixation and Immediate Post-Operative Finger Mobilisation in a Wrist SplintFrom the King Saud University, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Prof Mohammad M Al-Qattan, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia E-mail:moqattan{at}hotmail.com
The cerclage wire technique of internal fixation for displaced long oblique/spiral metacarpal shaft fractures has not gained popularity for two reasons: many believe that wire migration is a real possibility and that the fixation technique is not rigid enough to allow immediate postoperative finger mobilisation. In this report, the authors review the results of 19 cases of long oblique/spiral mid-shaft metacarpal shaft fractures of the fingers treated by cerclage wires and immediate postoperative mobilisation of all finger joints. The study included 17 men and two women with a mean age of 35 (range 18–45) years. After a mean follow-up of 8 weeks, all patients regained full range of motion of the fingers and no complications were noted. It is concluded that cerclage wire fixation of long oblique/spiral mid-shaft metacarpal fractures requires neither scoring of the bone (a technique recommended by other authors to prevent wire migration) nor finger immobilisation and that the technique consistently achieves good functional results.
Key Words: spiral metacarpal fractures cerclage wire fixation Minimally displaced long oblique/spiral fractures of the metacarpal shaft without rotational malalignment can be treated adequately using conservative measures (Eglseder et al., 1997). Furthermore, metacarpal shaft fractures with significant angular displacement (along the longitudinal axis of the bone) can be managed successfully with closed reduction, a short hand cast and immediate mobilisation of all joints of the hand and wrist (Debnath et al., 2004). In fractures requiring open reduction (either because of failure of closed reduction, in severely displaced fractures or for scissoring secondary to rotational malalignment), common internal fixation techniques include lag screws, plates and screws, multiple intramedullary pre-bent K-wires, interosseous loop wires or sutures and tension band wiring (Al-Qattan, 2006; Bruser et al., 1999; Crawford, 1976; Diao, 1997; Faraj and Davis, 1999). More than 20 years ago, Gropper and Bowen (1984) described the use of cerclage (dental) wires in the management of spiral and oblique metacarpal shaft fractures. This technique did not gain popularity for two reasons. Firstly, the authors believed that the bone always needed to be scored with a side-cutting burr so that migration of the wire following tightening did not occur and this complicated the technique. Secondly, the authors believed that the fingers needed to be immobilised for 10 to 14 days after surgery, since the fixation was not rigid. In this paper, we report on a series of 19 long oblique/ spiral metacarpal shaft fractures treated with cerclage dental wires to demonstrate that neither scoring of bone nor finger immobilisation is required for mid-shaft oblique/spiral fractures to achieve satisfactory results from this simple and inexpensive means of internal fixation.
All patients with long oblique/spiral metacarpal shaft fractures of the fingers treated by the senior author between 2000 and 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with insufficient data and those who were lost to follow-up before 6 weeks were excluded. The following data were documented from medical records: age, sex, aetiology of injury, site of fracture, number of cerclage wires used, complications and time to return to work. Total active motion (TAM), viz, active flexion of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints minus the extension deficit in these joints, was used to assess range of motion of both the injured and uninjured fingers of the involved hand at final follow-up. All patients had plain X-rays taken at final follow-up and fracture displacement was documented.
Patient selection and indications for surgery
Surgical Technique and Postoperative Mobilisation Protocol
A total of 26 patients were treated but only 19 had sufficient documentation and follow-up (minimum of 6 weeks) to include in this study. There were 17 men and two women with a mean age of 35 (range 18–45) years. Ten cases had rotational malalignment and the remaining nine cases had significant displacement, with failure of closed reduction. The fractured metacarpal was the index metacarpal in two patients, the middle metacarpal in six patients, the ring metacarpal in nine patients and the little finger metacarpal in two patients. The injuries occurred as a result of car accidents (n = 13), industrial injuries (n = 3), fighting (n = 2) and falls (n = 1). All patients had long, mid-shaft oblique/spiral metacarpal fractures. The number of cerclage wires used was either two (n = 9 fractures) or three (n = 10 fractures). No cases of infection, CRPS Type 1 (syn. Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Algodystrophy), dorsal digital nerve neuromas, malunion or non-union were noted. No complications relating to the wire, such as impingement on the extensor tendons, extrusion, wire migration or wire breakage, occurred and none of the patients required late removal of the wires. All patients obtained a full range of motion of the injured and uninjured fingers (TAM = 260°) at a mean final follow-up of 8 (range 6–12) weeks. This full range of motion was reached in all patients between 2 and 3 weeks after surgery and none required formal physiotherapy consultation (Fig 1). Almost all dorsal hand scars were wide and about 50% were slightly hyperpigmented, but none of the patients had cosmetic concerns. The average time to return to work was 5 (range 3–8) weeks.
In the English literature, we could find only one study which treated spiral/oblique metacarpal fractures with cerclage wires (Gropper and Bowen, 1984). These authors treated 21 fractures with two cerclage wires per fracture. The authors included long and short oblique, as well as spiral, fractures at various locations on the metacarpal shaft in their series. The bone was scored (in all cases) with a side-cutting burr. Scoring was done following open reduction, but prior to wire fixation. The cerclage wire was then placed at the site of the scored cortex (to prevent wire migration). The fingers were immobilised for 10 to 14 days after surgery. Seventeen patients had a full range of motion at final follow-up and the remaining four patients had minor (less than 15°) losses of range of motion. The average time to return to work after surgery was 7 weeks. The cerclage wire technique did not gain popularity and no other clinical series have been reported using this fixation technique over the last two decades. One reason is probably the recommendation by these authors to score the bone to avoid wire migration. Scoring the metacarpal bone, which is fractured in a spiral or long oblique pattern, may fracture the single remaining cortex on each side of the fracture site. We believe that the anatomical shape of the metacarpal should be taken into consideration in respect of consideration of possible wire migration. The metacarpal shaft is fairly thick proximally and distally, but remains thin, with a relatively constant diameter, in the mid-shaft. Therefore, cerclage wire migration towards the mid-shaft may occur following tightening in fractures located in the proximal, or distal, parts of the shaft. In these cases, we use a combination of interosseous loop and cerclage wires. On the other hand, cerclage wire migration does not occur (hence, there is no need for scoring or supplementary interosseous loops) if the fracture is located, and the wires are placed, along the mid-shaft, as in our study. Another reason why the cerclage technique did not become popular was because it is not considered a rigid fixation. Therefore, an initial period of total immobilisation was recommended (Gropper and Bowen, 1984), with greater likelihood of joint stiffness and tendon adhesions. Furthermore, several biomechanical studies of in vitro bending, torsion and axial loading following fixation of oblique/spiral metacarpal fracture clearly showed the superior stability of lag screws and plates and screws (Firoozbakhsh et al., 1993; Prevel et al., 1996). In fact, cerclage wires supplemented with K-wires were still significantly weaker than lag screws (Matloub et al., 1993). Although, we believe that these data are true, our study shows that the cerclage technique is "rigid enough" to allow immediate postoperative mobilisation of all finger joints. We also believe that the technique is suitable for multiple metacarpal fractures. It should be noted that we routinely immobilise the wrist joint after surgery. We are unable to demonstrate that wrist immobilisation is absolutely mandatory, but we strongly recommend it because we think it serves three purposes, viz, the moulding of the splint in the palm gives some support to the fracture site and helps sustain the metacarpal arch, the splint helps keep the wrist in extension (some patients tend to flex the wrist because of pain) and the splint reminds the patient that this is an injured hand and, hence, should not be used for carrying things. In a recent review of clinical studies of metacarpal fractures, Al-Qattan (2006) showed that, regardless of the method of internal fixation, the majority of patients are expected to regain a full range of motion, provided immediate postoperative mobilisation of the fingers is possible. Therefore, it was recommended that the choice of internal fixation should be based on the various advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Although lag screws are the strongest among all the fixation techniques for long oblique/spiral metacarpal fractures and screws can be inserted in a relatively short time, the technique is technically demanding, relatively expensive, requires special equipment, may require late removal and is less "forgiving". The latter disadvantage is a result of there often being only one optimal position for screw placement, so there are no opportunities for a "second chance" at fixation (Diao, 1997). In contrast, the cerclage wire technique (without bone scoring) for mid-shaft metacarpal fractures is "rigid enough" to allow immediate post-operative mobilisation and has several advantages, such as being simple, cheap, available and more "forgiving", with no need for late implant removal.
Manuscript received November 17, 2006. Accepted for publication May 31, 2007.
Al-Qattan MM (2006). Metacarpal shaft fractures of the fingers: treatment with interosseous loop wire fixation and immediate post operative finger mobilization in a wrist splint. Journal of Hand Surgery, 31B: 377–382.Bruser P, Krein R, Larkin G (1999). Fixation of metacarpal fractures using absorbable hemi-cerclage sutures. Journal of Hand Surgery, 24B: 683–687.Crawford GP (1976). Screw fixation for certain fractures of the phalanges and metacarpals. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 58A: 487–492.Debnath UK, Nassab RS, Oni JA, Davis TRC (2004). A prospective study of the treatment of hand fractures of the little finger metacarpal shaft with a short hand cast. Journal of Hand Surgery, 29B: 214–217.Diao E (1997). Metacarpal fixation. Hand Clinics, 13: 557–571.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]Eglseder WA, Juliano PJ, Roure R (1997). Fractures of the fourth metacarpal. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 11: 441–445.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]Faraj AA, Davis TRC (1999). Percutaneous intramedullary fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery, 24B: 76–79.Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Howey T, Castaneda E, Pirela-Cruz MA (1993). Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques. Journal of Hand Surgery, 18A: 1059–1068.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]Gropper PT, Bowen V (1984). Cerclage wiring of metacarpal fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 188: 203–207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]Matloub HS, Jensen PL, Sanger JR, Grunert BK, Yousif NJ (1993). Spiral fracture fixation techniques. A biomechanical study. Journal of Hand Surgery, 18B: 515–519.Prevel CD, Morgan R, Molnar J, Eppley BL, Moore K (1996). Biomechanical testing of titanium selft-tapping versus pre-tapped lag screw fixation of spiral metacarpal fractures. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37: 34–40.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 32, No. 6,
637-640 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

