Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1753193408098480v1
34/2/201    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svernlov, B.
Right arrow Articles by Adolfsson, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svernlov, B.
Right arrow Articles by Adolfsson, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome

Birgitta Svernlov*, M Larsson, K Rehn, and L Adolfsson

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery & Burns, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Linköping University Hospital, and Department of Orthopaedics, Västervik County Hospital, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome was evaluated in a randomised study of 70 patients with mild or moderate symptoms (Dellon, 1989). All patients were informed about the cause of symptoms and allocated to three groups: night splinting, nerve gliding and control. Evaluation consisted of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, visual analogue pain scales, strength measurements and neurophysiological examination, before treatment and after six months. Fifty-seven patients were followed for six months. Fifty-one (89.5%) were improved at the follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the recorded variables. Night splints and nerve gliding exercises did not add favourably. Routine neurophysiological examination seems unnecessary since 76% of the patients with typical symptoms had normal findings and 75% with pathological findings improved. Patients with mild or moderate symptoms have a good prognosis if they are informed of the causes of the condition and how to avoid provocation.

Key Words: elbow, ulnar nerve, neuropathy, nerve gliding, splinting

First published on March 12, 2009, doi:10.1177/1753193408098480

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 2009;34:201.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?